|
Empis bicuspidata
|
|
Subspecies
Original
description
Synonyms
Empis fuscipes
Gmelin, 1790 (nec Fabricius, 1794; nec
Brullé, 1832) (nomen oblitum; nomen
dubium; unclear synonym)
Empis pennaria bicuspidata Collin, 1927
Empis bicuspidata (Collin, 1927)
Note on the
taxonomical history of the name Empis
fuscipes: During his lifetime Nathaniel
Gottfried Leske (1751-1786) gathered a large
collection of natural objects, mainly stones
and minerals, but also animals. Today largely
forgotten, Leske was a well-known scientist at
his time and his collection was the then
famous "Museum Leskeanum" and was frequented
by numerous scientists. When Leske was
appointed as a professor in Marburg (Germany)
he mailed his collection to the university.
Later, when he travelled to his new post, his
coach had an accident and he died several days
after. Curators at the Marburg university, who
already had the opportunity to see the Leske
collection that was sent to them, now tried to
convince Landgraf (landgrave) Wilhelm IX to
buy the collection for the university.
However, the price was too high and thus the
collection was not acquired. Nevertheless,
contemporary geologists and zoologists
catalogued the collection and published these
efforts in the book "Museum Leskeanum" in
1789, edited by Dietrich Ludwig Gustav Karsten
(Karsten 1789). This work is largely forgotten
today and has even been excluded from
Zoological Nomenclature in Opinion 1877 (ICZN
1997). Karsten was involved in cataloguing the
geological objects and shells in Leske´s
collection. The insects were catalogued by
Johann Jacob Zschach and these pages have been
published separately one year before the
complete work (Zschach 1788). Thus, this
latter work is available for Zoological
Nomenclature, because it is mentioned in the
Application (Rosenberg 1996) but not on the
Official Index. The Museum Leskeanum has an
indirect impact on insect nomenclature: Gmelin
was aware of the book and in his 1790 volume
(Gmelin 1790) he copied the descriptions of
insects from Museum Leskeanum and gave
binominal names to them. Thus, these names are
available. He named one of the species "Empis
fuscipes". Thus, this name is a senior primary
homonym of Empis
fuscipes Fabricius, 1794. However,
according to Article 23.9.1. of the
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature
it is possible to disregard the senior homonym
if it has not been in use after 1899 and the
junior homonym has been in frequent use. To my
knowledge, the name by Gmelin has never been
used in any other publication and is thus a
perfect nomen oblitum. It is difficult to
determine whether Article 23.9.1.2. is met,
because the body of literature on this
particular Empis species is small given that
Dipterology is not as proliferative as e.g.
Lepidopterology or Coleopterology. But I
suggest that Empis fuscipes Fabricius, 1794
should be regarded as a nomen protectum.
The name Empis fuscipes Gmelin, 1790 is a nomen dubium and
the description is too general to identify it.
However, the few descriptive words in the
original description agree with the present
species and therefore I assign the name to the
present species as a possible but very
tentative synonym.
Empis fuscipes
Brullé, 1832 is a nomen dubium as well.
It has not been described from Germany, but
from Greece and therefore I do not regard this
name further. It might denote a separate Greek
species; if so it would need a new name,
because the name by Brullé is a junior
primary homonym of Empis fuscipes Gmelin, 1790
and Empis fuscipes Fabricius, 1794.
Identification
Distribution
Biology
This page has been updated on February 11, 2012
This site is online since May 31, 2005
Copyright © by Nikola-Michael Prpic. All
rights reserved.
|
|
|