|
Phylum
Nematoda
A systematic overview
|
|
Traditionally, the
Nematoda are divided into two large groups, the
Adenophorea (or
Aphasmidia) and the Secernentea (or Phasmidia).
Recent phylogenetic
analyses, however, suggest that the Adenophorea
are paraphyletic with
respect to the Secernentea. Several authors have
therefore abandoned
this subdivision, but I retain it for the time
being until a
comprehensive new framework for the Nematoda is
established that also
includes scientific names for all important
groups.
Similar to the
high level
groups, some of the traditional groups of
lower rank are paraphyletic as well. In
addition, some of the
traditional groups underwent "fusion" or
"splitting" events based on
new phylogenetic insight. Some of the more
significant changes are as
follows: Members of the traditional group
Trefusiida are now included
in the
Enoplida or in the group Triplonchida. The
Mononchida, that were
formerly included in the
Dorylaimida, are now listed as a separate high
ranking group. The
groups Mermithida and Trichinellida, that
formerly constitued the taxon
Trichosyringida (or Trichocephalida) are now
separate high ranking
groups and the Trichosyringida is abandoned.
From the Chromadorida in
the traditional sense are now separated the
Plectida and Desmodorida.
However, the latter group appears to be
non-monophyletic as well and
this needs further research. The Monhysterida
now include the formerly
separate Desmoscolecida. In addition, the taxon
Araeolaimida that has
recently been excluded from the Monhysterida,
appears to be
non-monophyletic and is now included in
Monhysterida again by some authors. In
addition, the Monhysterida is paraphyletic in
some analyses.
The Secernentea
are
indeed a monophyletic group, but most recent
analyses show that this group is synonymous with
the traditional taxon
Rhabditida, because Rhabditida are paraphyletic
with respect to the
remaining Secernentea. However, I keep the
Rhabditida in its
paraphyletic form until further analyses become
available. The
Strongylida appear to be within a basal
Rhabditida group, but for the
time being I keep it as a separate Ordo. The
Aphelenchida and certain
Rhabditida (e.g. Strongyloides) appear to be
closely related to
Tylenchida, but I retain here provisionally
their traditional
assignment.
In summary, the
phylogeny
and taxonomy of the Nematoda is currently in
a state of flux and requires substantial
research before a satisfying
solution can be reached. In the meantime I use
here a conservative
systematic framework that tries to keep
traditional groups if their
monophyly is not yet rejected, but also accepts
new developments as
long as they are well-founded.
|
This page has
been
updated on April 15, 2011
This site is online since May 31, 2005
Copyright © by Nikola-Michael
Prpic-Schäper. All rights reserved.
|
|
|