Subspecies
Other authors recognize six subspecies, Eresus
kollari kollari, Eresus kollari bifasciatus
Ermolajev, 1937, Eresus kollari frontalis
Latreille, 1819, Eresus kollari ignicomus
Simon, 1914, Eresus kollari latefasciatus
Simon, 1911, and Eresus kollari tricolor
Simon, 1873. However, these taxa are either
island forms (e.g. from Corsica) or occur at
widely separated localities (e.g. Algeria,
Russia). Thus, I think that these taxa should
better be viewed as well-separated taxa and
therefore I regard them here as bonae species.
I do not recognize any subspecies of Eresus
kollari.
Original
description
Synonyms
Aranea nigra
Petagna, 1787 (p. 34) (nec
Fabricius, 1775; junior homonym) (unclear synonym,
see below)
Eresus niger (Petagna, 1787)
Eresus niger
niger (Petagna, 1787)
Chersis niger (Petagna, 1787)
Type
locality: "Invenitur in planis saltuum
Rheginorum, vulgo Aspromonte" (= Reggio Calabria,
Italy)
Aranea cinnaberina
Olivier, 1789 (p. 221) (unclear synonym, see
below)
Aranea
cinnaberinus (Olivier, 1789)
Erythrophorus cinnaberinus (Olivier, 1789)
Eresus cinnaberinus (Olivier, 1789)
Type
locality: "elle a été prise
a Florence" (Florence, Italy).
Aranea moniligera
De Villers, 1789 (unclear synonym,
see below)
Eresus moniligera (De
Villers, 1789)
Type
locality: not given. However, the note
"Hab. in agris" (= "lives in fields")
points to a species that was frequent in
local agricultural fields and was known to
De Villers from his own experience and not
just from dead specimens. And the note "Ex
nostr. Mus." (= "from our Museum") also
points to a local provenance. Thus, the
type locality may be assumed to be Lyon,
France.
Aranea
quatuorguttata Rossi, 1790 (p. 135) (unclear
synonym, see below)
Erythrophorus quatuorguttatus
(Rossi, 1790)
Eresus quatuorguttatus
(Rossi, 1790)
Type
locality: Florence and Pisa (as inferred
from book title).
Eresus ater
Walckenaer, 1805 (p. 21) (replacement name)
(unclear synonym, see below)
Type locality:
see Aranea nigra (above).
Chersis dubius
Walckenaer, 1837 (p. 392) (unclear synonym,
see below)
Type locality:
"Dans le royaume de Naples" (Naples,
Italy).
Eresus illustris
C. L. Koch, 1837 (p. 105) (unclear synonym,
see below)
Type locality:
unknown. Koch suggests "Vermuthlich ist
diese Spinne in Ungarn zu Hause", but Ungarn
(= Hungary) in the borders of 1837 might
also include type localities outside
today´s Hungary.
Eresus kollari
Rossi, 1846 (p. 17)
Eresus kollari kollari Rossi,
1846
Type
locality: "auf einem Hügel bei
Baden", "Wiener Gegend" (Baden,
Niederösterreich, near Vienna,
Austria)
Eresus fulvus
Rossi, 1846 (p. 17) (unclear synonym, see
below)
Type locality:
"Unteritalien, Dalmatien, die Krim und
Syrien" (lower Italy, Dalmatia (Croatia),
Crimea (Ukraine), Syria).
Eresus guerinii
Lucas, 1846 (p. 133)
Type locality:
Tenes, Algeria.
Eresus tristis
Kroneberg, 1875
Eresus nigel auct. (misspelling)
Note: the nominal taxa Aranea nigra (and its
replacement name Eresus ater), Aranea
cinnaberina, Aranea moniligera, Aranea
quatuorguttata, Chersis dubius and Eresus
illustris have all been regarded as possible
senior synonyms of the present species.
However, Rezac
et al. 2008 argue that these taxa have
been described from localities where several
similar species are known to occur and that
the often short original descriptions are not
sufficient to identify the names
unambiguously. Thus, these authors regard all
of these names as nomina dubia and use Eresus
kollari as the valid name, because this is the
oldest name that can be unambiguously assigned
to the present species. I agree that
especially for the Italian fauna the
systematics of Eresus are unclear and there
may be several novel species that still await
formal description. Thus, the taxa described
on the basis of Italian specimens (i.e. Aranea
nigra and Eresus ater (from Reggio Calabria),
Aranea cinnaberina (from Florence), Aranea
quatuorguttata (from Florence and Pisa) and
Chersis dubius (from Naples)) might indeed
refer to hitherto undescribed Italian species.
However, Eresus illustris (probably from
Austria or Hungary) and Aranea moniligera
(probably from Lyon, France) were described
from areas where the present species is the
only species with red-and-black hindlegs, and
thus the names quite confidently apply to the
present species. Indeed, all original
descriptions (those from Italy, as well as
those from Austria/Hungary and France) fit the
present species very well and I therefore do
not fully agree with the notion of Rezac
et al. 2008 that these names are nomina
dubia. However, I provisionally accept Eresus
kollari as the valid name until a full
revision of all Eresus species of the World
clarifies the taxonomy of this genus.
Note: Eresus fulvus might be a separate
species.
Note: Several authors suggest that the present
species is in fact a species-complex of two
cryptic species, one species west of the River
Elbe and one species east of the River Elbe.
Given the huge range of the species from Spain
in the west to Central Asia in the east, I
think that it is likely that there is some
genetic substructuring. However, the basis for the idea
of a western and an eastern cryptic species is
a phylogenetic
analysis of allozyme sequences shown in Fig. 7
in Rezac
et al. 2008. This analysis is not
suitable to support their claim, because
support for most of the nodes in the tree is
not statistically significant and these nodes
should have been collapsed (leading to the
"disappearance" of the two separated groups in
the tree). Thus, the notion that two separate
species are involved requires more evidence
and is currently not corroborated.
Identification
Distribution
Biology
|