Search help

Home > Metazoa > Arthropoda > Insecta > Lepidoptera > Pterophoridae
Crombrugghia distans
 
 
< Previous    |    Next >

Subspecies
No subspecies are currently recognized. However, this species is very variable and might in fact comprise several separate subspecies or even species. Some morphologically distinct populations have already been described as separate taxa, but have later been synonymized again with the nominal form. I list these taxa in the synonymy below, but I expect that detailed systematic analyses will reveal that Crombrugghia distans comprises a number of separate taxa.


Synonyms
Pterophorus distans Zeller, 1847
Oxyptilus distans (Zeller, 1847)
Crombrugghia distans (Zeller, 1847)
Pterophorus distantidactyla Bruand, 1858
Oxyptilus geodactylus Fuchs, 1903
Capperia geodactylus (Fuchs, 1903)
Oxyptilus lactucae Fletcher, 1920
Oxyptilus clarisignis Meyrick, 1924
Oxyptilus buvati Bigot et Picard, 1988
Oxyptilus buvati buvati Bigot et Picard, 1988
Oxyptilus buvati propedistans Bigot et Picard, 1988
Oxyptilus propedistans (Bigot et Picard, 1988)
Oxyptilus pravieli Bigot et Picard, 1989
Oxyptilus gibeauxi Bigot, Nel et Picard, 1990
Oxyptilus jaeckhi Bigot et Picard, 1991
Oxyptilus supplementum Gibeaux, 1997
Oxyptilus laetus auct. nec Zeller, 1847 (misidentification)
Crombrugghia tristis auct. nec Zeller, 1841 (frequent misidentification, see Haslberger et al. 2016)

Note: Oxyptilus adamczewskii is either listed as a synonym of the present species or of Crombrugghia tristis. I provisionally follow here the latter interpretation, but I expect that the status of many taxa in Crombrugghia will change when a detailed systematic analysis and revision is performed in the future.

The validity of the genus Crombrugghia has recently been questioned and several authors now synonymize it with the genus Oxyptilus. I provisionally retain it in Crombrugghia until more phylogenetic information becomes available.
 


Identification
No information has been entered yet.


Distribution
A rare species that is more frequently recoded in the northern parts of Germany. Most records from southern Germany have turned out to be misidentifications of other species (see Haslberger et al. 2016).


Biology
No information has been entered yet.


Search in the References Database


No image available yet.



Home   |   Site tutorial & Help   |   Links   |   Citation   |   News & Notices   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Disclaimer   |   Contact

This page has been updated on January 2, 2015
This site is online since May 31, 2005
Copyright © by Nikola-Michael Prpic-Schäper. All rights reserved.